Day after day, picture after picture, following the weather and seasons
More than 300 "Pictures of the day" on www.enricodalbosco.it, my personal page


Latest articles
2013, June 30Auto-generated 3D Models - Appendix B1 - A few experiments with a 3D Machine
2013, June 18Auto-generated 3D Models - Appendix B - Meet The BIG-3D-GENERATOR Machine
2013, June 6Auto-generated 3D Models - Appendix C - Our Old Models Now Very Slim
2013, May 25Auto-generated 3D Models - Appendix A - About St. John auto-generated
2013, May 14Auto-generated 3D Models - 3) Cezanne's Lesson
2013, May 4Auto-generated 3D Models - 2) Visual Comparison
2013, April 29Auto-generated 3D Models - 1) Environment
2013, April 10Thanks cgilbert!
where it is shown how, in certain cases, an evaluation with four stars counts much more then... five stars!
2013, April 7Hi Joe (Joes)...
3D Warehouse fake users customs and traditions : some things that not everyone knows...
2013, March 29StPeter on "El País"
Marc 12 last the Spanish newspaper "El País" published my 3D model of St Peter's Basilica with the Bernini's Colonnade - but they did not tell me not even "thanks"!

Sunday, November 8, 2009

My vision


*

Honore Daumier, Don Quixote and Sancho Panza - c. 1866-68 Oil on canvas 40.2 x 33 cm
The Armand Hammer Museum of Art and Cultural Center, Los Angeles




I propose here to you some free remarks on my way of viewing the 3D models


For me a model is an object of art: the token chosen (the church, the building,...) must like a lot to me because I bring in the idea of playing - if I do not like it, I don't even start the implementation


In order taht I can complete and publish the model, it must succeed me as I had in mind from the start, and if at some point it doesn't convince me more, I throw it away and switch to another - and I can say I've got three or four, including important buildings, which I started and not completed for this reason


In my vision a model 'perfect' is not necessarily a model 'quite realistic', like a photograph taken by by an eager tourist , but I want (I would) go a bit longer there - just like painters - I'd try to capture the essence of that building, that church, that air that goes around.


I do not like too the wholly architectural models with all the details rendered with the geometry and no textures, such as reconstruction of the ancient temples, although I must admit that they hard to do, and that they can be very pleasant, if made workmanlike; I like to see these models when they have a great cultural and historical interest, but I would never started to make this type of models - even if I made "La Rotonda" by Palladio, but I tried to clothe it with its old a bit worn plaster...


I can not stand the repetitive textures that are used to doing certain floors or lawns, or some unfinished walls; if you really have to use them, at least they must fit together perfectly, without 'cuts' betweens tiles! I didn't consider and vote many beautiful models because of this peculiarity that I judge a big flaw: in nature there is nothing, at least at the macroscopic level, which is repeated in exactly the same way without little - but appreciable - differences!


All the texture of a model must be clearly agreed between themselves,  regarding colors, tones, grain...


Speaking of textures: there are particular points in a model where either the textures are chosen and applied 'perfectly' or it is better to put a simple flat color or a texture very 'generic'... choosing the "lesser evil": and these points tipically are the tips of the towers, the roofs of the apses, domes etc.


To end with the textures: the quality of texture is equally important for me than the quality of architecture; and unfortunately obtaining a good texture is time consuming and requires also an in-depth knowledge of a graphical tool; indeed it is almost never possible to have (or even take) photographs which don't require adjustments of color, lights, texture, removal or addition of parts...; in many of my models I have devoted most of my time and attention to textures but not the architecture!




There would be many considerations to be done, good and bad examples to show...
but it will be for another time!



from The History of Don Quixote de la Mancha, 1922 London, Constable & Co. (see Greetings)




*
*

.